Scissors faster than light

Scissor plates

Ok, for a change in pace from momentum for a moment, Consider the good old light speed limit. Now I am not going to get into whether on not some tiny subatomic particle can do something weird and interesting only to physicists with nothing better to worry about, and a HUGE research budget.

Lets think about a macro example, something that at least in principle “anyone” could actually do, and see.

scissors

Suppose you have two sheets of metal plate, and arrange them like scissor blades, so the corner is just laying over each other. Like the diagram above. I don’t want to complicate this with rotating surfaces and stuff (makes my head hurt) and nothing moving so fast that we have to worry about relativity.

So lets bolt or weld one in place and we’ll move the whole other one laterally, so the “V” closes (but neither is rotating).

Nip point

Now let’s think about the nip-point, the black dot in the pics, the bit where the edge of the top and bottom plate cross (one above the other). At a small angle, for even a small speed, that nip point is going to be “moving” pretty damn fast. Its not actually moving, of course, only one of the plates is moving.

How fast? Well, if we keep things well away from relativity speeds, Then

Nip Speed = Sheet Speed / tan(Angle).

So if Angle = 1°, which is pretty easy to setup with a protractor really, then

Nip Speed ≈ 60 × Sheet speed,

which is pretty interesting, but no biggie. But what if I had a pretty good X-Y stage and took a bit of time. I could easily get Angle = 0.1°, then

Nip Speed ≈ 600 × Sheet speed.

So if I give a good shove, say 40 km/hr, which you gotta admit isn’t terribly close to light speed, then Nip Speed ≈ 20,000 km/hr, which is pretty respectable.

But hey, its just a point in space, not an actual THING moving that fast.

But what if we put a piece of paper in there. That’s one FAST cut on the paper!

Light speed

Alright that’s interesting, but hey, what if I was a physicist with only a small budget, but lots time to tinker with some good engineering gear. Turns out you really CAN adjust angles to 10-6 or so degrees accuracy. Let’s just suppose we can do 10-4 degrees, cos we have SOME time, but not so big a budget.

Now, what about this top steel sheet, can’t we get it a bit quicker? Say 1000 m/sec (3600 km/hr). Ok, that’s pretty respectable, and not so easy, but this isn’t much more than most bullets, in fact supersonic bullets regularly exceed this, and big guns (battle ships, etc.) regularly do a LOT more. Rockets achieve this pretty regularly, and any satellite would probably fall out of the sky that slow.

OK, so away it goes, nice steady speed, cos we really tinkered with the gear. And we have our nice clean piece of paper in the nip there. The wee bit of paper is going to get cut at

Nip Speed ≈ (6 × 108) × Sheet speed

            ≈ 2.4 × 109 km/hr

                ≈ 2 × Speed of light

Now THAT is impressive.

Cutting the paper

So our paper is being cut at twice the speed of light. Of light. You know, that thing NOTHING can happen faster than.

Really?   Well, yeah.

There’s nothing here that’s impossible or anywhere close to relativistic speeds. We could probably get arbitrarily fast with a few tweaks, a bit more time to tinker (and larger budget, but not too large, or we might get frightened off and just talk about at the pub…).

These are steel plates, and while it’s a really good piece of paper, there’s nothing here to stop that cut happening. Its fast, but not all that fast, especially since the nip point means there’s no “spreading” of the effect, in the way like a bullet might, impacting on a piece of paper.

So what happens to the sheet? And if you think the bend of the sheet will cause problems, pick something really easy to cut, like (say) a gas or whatever: for sure NOTHING is getting away from the nip point!

There is an actual physical change occurring faster than light speed here. ANY change causes physical effects radiating away from the change point. This change point is, well, FAST. REALLY fast. Mind bogglingly fast. Literally faster than fast!

At the very least there’s going to be one hell of a burst of blue light! And that just might attract the attention of the auditors, so it might be best to get the drinking in before the experiment.

And what about two observers one going left to right, the other right to left? One is going to see the paper severed before it’s cut!

Is your head spinning yet? Because I think the other one might actually see the paper UN-CUTTING… Around about then, some serious drinking is in your immediate future (or past, I guess)

Anyone got a wee research fund floating around? I think I have a really cool project for you!

R

2 thoughts on “Scissors faster than light”

  1. Bob – I don’t know how to sign on to your post (regarding the scissors exceeding light speed), but here’s what I wanted to say:

    There are extensive discussions of this point, and I’d come across a couple now and then. You don’t even need such precision mechanisms as you describe, all you need, for example, is a simple laser pointer. Point it at the moon, for example. Then wiggle it a bit. The illuminated spot will dance around on the moons surface much faster than light could travel from one illuminated spot to the next. Where the light-speed limit comes in, in a case like that, is that nothing actually moves from one illuminated spot to the next, not matter, not energy, not even information. A receiver at the later illuminated spot cannot receive any sort of signal from the earlier illuminated spot.

    In the case of your “scissors” I don’t know how the physics would actually play out, but I see at least a few possible limiting factors. First is the question of whether there is anything more at the later spot than a conceptual point of intersection; there is nothing physical actually there. A later spot on the paper could not receive anything from the earlier spot, similar to the experiment with the laser pointer. The second is simple physics of materials: how fast can anything material be made to move? Usually the speed of sound in a material is the limiting speed at which anything can happen in the material; look how hard it is to get something to move faster than sound even in air, imagine how hard it would be to get something to move faster than sound in a piece of steel!

    All that said, there are physical things known that do in fact move faster than light. The main one that I can think of is the phase velocity of light. The “speed of light” limit refers to the group velocity, but the phase velocity in a light beam can be faster than the group velocity under certain circumstances. However, as with the “laser pointer at the moon” experiment, the phase velocity cannot be used to carry any sort of a signal. Energy flows at the rate of the group velocity, so Einstein is saved!

    A lot of very smart people, many of them physicists who know what they’re talking about (not like me!) have tried to devise all sorts of schemes to get around the light-speed limit, just like 100 years ago they used to try to violate the laws of thermodynamics and create perpetual-motion machines. So far, the universe has always won, in both cases!

    Howard

    \o/ /_\

    Like

    1. Howard,

      I somehow set up the site to require moderation for the comments. I think this was back when it seemed to get hacked every second day. Now I can’t work out how to turn that off! Tomorrow’s problem :).

      Yep, I didn’t think this violated anything, its just a really interesting macro-sized experiment that sure seems like something actually real and physical is happening faster than light speed. I don’t know if this could be a signalling system, wouldn’t think so.

      I would just like to do the experiment and see what happens. This is the physics equivalent of “bucket chemistry”. No particularly fancy gazillion dollar complex as all hell equipment, and yet here is “something” quite physical and straight-forward happening faster than speed of light.

      What would happen at that nip point? (Maybe the auditors would appear in person 🙂 ). Just a fascinating experiment to actually do I reckon.

      Robert

      Like

Leave a Reply to hlmark@nearinfrared.com Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s